halfling_danny's Journal

2:02pm: Antoher quiz.
Stolen from a rabbit.

If You Ruled the Land . . . by wackyweasel
Your first name:
How you gained your rule:	Military coup, of course! They never saw it coming . . .Walked in and took the throne while they were at lunchRightful heir!!Strategic poisoning . . .Mind controlAsked for it really nicely, 'pretty please'No idea . . .
Your title is:	Your Royal Sexyness
Your symbol is:	a blue dragon - cool and slick, oh yeah, just like you
You rule from:	a clear, crystalline palace, and change in the basement
At your side is:	your huge red dragon, Ringo
Your enforcers, troops, and guards are all:	elves - with WINGS!!
Your most popular law is:	No-pants Fridays
Your least popular law is:	Pinky swearing equals a binding contract
Your worst enemy is:	um, the peasants you oppress?
Your popularity rating is:: 57%
Your chance of being overthrown is:: 14%
Quiz created with MemeGen!

9:41am: Alignment test.
I took an alignment test, blatantly stolen from an online acquintance.

Lawful-Good 72% Good, 38% Chaotic

Plane of Existence: Mount Celestia, "The Seven Heavens". Description: Countless paladins and saints have ascended here. Notable Inhabitants: Angels and Devas. Examples of Lawful-Goods (Ethically Lawful, Morally Good) Aeris "Aerith" Gainsborough (FFVII) Superman The Tick ("Lawful Stupid") Abraham Lincoln Sherlock Holmes Phileas Fogg Captain Picard A person with a lawful good attitude believes in the use of authority and rule of law to bring good to the greatest number of people. Her/His actions support the status quo and s/he uses systems and organizations to achieve good goals. S/He will keep his/her word and value truth. S/He will avoid the use of poison and use violence only when authorized to do so or in self defense. S/He may or may not be disciplined, organized, emotionally restrained, caring, compassionate, and peaceful, but s/he believes that these are admirable qualities. Respects law and order and is willing to suffer limitations on individual freedom for the benefit of the group. Puts moral principles before material considerations. The lawful good person will be a very faithful member of a group, but if the laws of the group clash with the ethics dictated by his or her moral alignment, the lawful good person will probably leave that group and look for a group more closely aligned with his or her ethics. The lawful good person is an active advocate of his or her beliefs. Lawful Good "Saintly" "Crusader" A lawful good [person] upholds society and its laws, believing that these laws are created to work for the good and prosperity of all. He is both honest and benevolent. He will work within the established system to change it for the better, and strives to bring order to goodness that other good-aligned [people] might pool their resources to better the world. A lawful good [person] combines a commitment to oppose evil with discipline. Most lawful good [people] live by a strict code of honor, or by the rules of conduct set down by their deity. They will generally selflessly act by these codes even at the cost of their own life. Lawful good combines honor and compassion for the innocent. A knight/paladin who always follows the orders of his superiors is an example of a lawful good [person]. Other Alignments and Tendencies (Tendenices are what you would more often sway towards; esp. for Neutrals): 0-39% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Evil 0-39% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: Neutral-Evil 0-39% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Evil 40-60% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Neutral 40-60% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: True Neutral 40-60% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Neutral 61-100% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: Neutral-Good 61-100% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Good</i>

My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 73% on Good You scored higher than 14% on Chaotic

Link: The Alignment Test written by xan81 on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

Frankly, I thought I'd end up with Neutral Good, Lawful Neutral, True Neutral or Lazy Neutral.

10:09am: My complaint about Mr. Daniel Marcos Galimidi
When I used to hear about illiterate students graduating from school, I often wondered how that was possible. But after encountering some of Mr. Daniel Marcos Galimidi's more contemptuous press releases, I now realize that not only is it possible for people to graduate without having learned fundamental skills such as reading and writing, but that it's possible for these same people to believe that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and the worst sorts of illogical hellions I've ever seen. Let's review the errors in Daniel's statements in order. First, most law-abiding citizens disapprove of Daniel's methods. Might I suggest that Daniel search for a hobby? It seems he has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to flush all my hopes and dreams down the toilet.

There are three fairly obvious problems with Daniel's insults, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. First, Daniel is not just morally questionable, but proud of it. Second, Daniel goes ballistic every time I so much as hint that our real enemy is the uncouth system that made him as malignant as he is. And third, he is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when two-faced, obtrusive scatterbrains force Daniel's moral code on the rest of us. Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified. And fear of yellow-bellied swindlers like Daniel who peddle the snake oil of uncompanionable antagonism. I mean, the justification he gave for seeking to feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly unregenerate agendas was one of the most gloomy justifications I've ever heard. It was so gloomy, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: If Daniel succeeds in his attempt to lionize biggety lunatics, it'll have to be over my dead body.

If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of escapism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, Daniel is off at a trot. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, I can unquestionably suggest how Daniel ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Daniel himself. Perhaps he has never had to take a stand and fight for something as critical as our right to identify, challenge, defy, disrupt, and, finally, destroy the institutions that instill distrust and thereby create a need for his unsavory views. But knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Daniel spends his leisure time devising ever more cantankerous ways to replace discourse and open dialogue with contemptible plans for the future and blatant ugliness. In closing, all that I ask is that you join me to stop Mr. Daniel Marcos Galimidi and help you reflect and reexamine your views on Daniel.
---

Taken from here. I find it amusing that actual complains about me have also dealt with my alleged two-sidedeness. : P

10:29pm: Uh, hello?
I got me a livejournal. I'll try to not emo or angst, since it looks like everybody with a livejournal is accused of doing that. >_>;♠

Anyways, yeah. I have a blog in which to give out any kind of unnecessary information to anyone watching. I hope to be interesting or un-annoying. ^_^/